Fiche du document
- doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.11.008
- issn: 0022-1759
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jim.2017.11.008
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/29174717
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1872-7905
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_52B838044D381
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sujets proches
Instruction and study--Methods Instruction and study--MethodsCiter ce document
M.D. Leipold et al., « Comparison of CyTOF assays across sites: Results of a six-center pilot study. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1016/j.jim.2017.11.008
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
For more than five years, high-dimensional mass cytometry has been employed to study immunology. However, these studies have typically been performed in one laboratory on one or few instruments. We present the results of a six-center study using healthy control human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and commercially available reagents to test the intra-site and inter-site variation of mass cytometers and operators. We used prestained controls generated by the primary center as a reference to compare against samples stained at each individual center. Data were analyzed at the primary center, including investigating the effects of two normalization methods. All six sites performed similarly, with CVs for both Frequency of Parent and median signal intensity (MSI) values