Tokophobia and fear of birth: a workshop consensus statement on current issues and recommendations for future research.
Fiche du document
- doi: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1843908
- issn: 0264-6838
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/02646838.2020.1843908
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/33206580
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1469-672X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_2704A1ABFF680
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Fright Understanding Birth Birthing Live birth Child birthCiter ce document
J. Jomeen et al., « Tokophobia and fear of birth: a workshop consensus statement on current issues and recommendations for future research. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1080/02646838.2020.1843908
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Objective: To discuss and develop a statement on the current state of the evidence and opinion in Fear of Childbirth (FoC) and Tokophobia (Tocophobia), and to provide recommendations. Background: A group met in 2019 to discuss the state of clinical and academic knowledge relating to FoC/Tokophobia. Five key areas were agreed as the focus of the meeting. Methods: 12 internationally acknowledged experts, in this or a closely related area (e.g. PTSD) met to discuss their understanding of the evidence for FoC/ Tokophobia and current practice. The consensus described in this paper constitutes the expression of the general opinion of the participants and does not necessarily imply unanimity. Keys points: Work focussed on tokophobia is recent and there remains a wide range of issues, which were addressed in the workshop including complexity in defining prevalence, a theoretical lack of understanding, which creates challenge for robust assessment and the identification of risk factors. An improved aetiological and developmental understanding of the tokophobia is required to underpin appropriate, effective and evidence-based interventions. Evaluation of pathways of care and relevant interventions, should be a focus of future research. Conclusion: Significant gaps remain within the FoC/tokophobia knowledge base. Further research is necessary.