Fiche du document
15 avril 2024
- doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad106
- issn: 0263-2136
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/fampra/cmad106
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/37972300
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1460-2229
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C3C318E6044C4
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sujets proches
Doctors Doctors of medicine MDs (Physicians) Medical doctors Allopathic doctors Medical professionCiter ce document
J.C. Suris, « Adolescent behavioural risk screening in primary care: physician's point of view. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1093/fampra/cmad106
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Despite regular consultation between adolescents/young adults (AYA) and their physicians, they are not regularly screened for psychosocial risk behaviours. This study examines physicians' self-reported psychosocial risk behaviour screening in AYA. It aims to highlight which elements hinder or improve screening abilities. The design was a cross-sectional quantitative survey. Data were obtained through a self-reported questionnaire sent out to primary care physicians (PCP) in Switzerland in 2018. The target population consisted of 1,824 PCP (29% response rate). Participants were asked whether they screened youths from 3 age groups [10-14 y/o, 15-20 y/o, and 21-25y/o] for the HEEADSSS items during child well visits and routine checkups. Barriers to screening included primary consultation motive prioritization, insufficient time, patient compliance, reimbursement, lack of skills related to adolescent health, lack of referral options. Data were analysed first through a bivariate analysis using Chi-square tests then through a multinomial logistic regression. The majority of physicians partook in preventive screening for 3-5 psychosocial risk elements. They reported the primary consultation motive as well as a lack of available time as having a high impact on their screening habits. Physician's experience and having discussed confidentiality were related to an increase in the number of topics addressed. Confidentiality remained a significant variable throughout all analyses. Barriers such as lack of consultation time and prioritization issues were found by physicians to be critical but did not hinder screening habits. The main element impacting screening habits was assuring confidentiality and the second is self-efficacy.
