On the Dangers of Public Credit for France's Monarchy: How an Old Warning Sheds a Certain Light on 1789
Fiche du document
30 octobre 2020
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1108/s0743-41542020000038c006
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/9781838677084
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/9781838677077
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0743-4154
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_F6D9D9668C4B8
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess , Restricted: cannot be viewed until 2100-03-31 , All rights reserved , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Work, Method of Industry (Psychology) Method of work Prediction Forecasts Futurology BorrowingCiter ce document
Pierre de Saint-Phalle, « On the Dangers of Public Credit for France's Monarchy: How an Old Warning Sheds a Certain Light on 1789 », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1108/s0743-41542020000038c006
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Steuart’s work was still relevant in 1789 for two reasons. Firstly, the author’s prediction of political antagonism between capitalists and nobility anticipated the political conflict about debt expressed by pamphleteers such as Sieyès, Mirabeau, and Clavière between 1787 and 1789. This is the context of Étienne de Sénovert’s claim: the political narrative built by the revolutionaries of 1789 (rescuing the “sacred” public debt from royal despotism) fitted Steuart’s prediction. This may have been the incentive for the translation and publication of his work in 1789 and 1790. Secondly, Steuart’s financial and monetary theory was at the heart of the project of financial reform that would lead to the assignats. Steuart’s (1767) theory of public finance and state power in 1789 provides a key to the understanding the events of the time, and to how actors tried to make sense of them. Steuart made another crucial observation about the deep effect of what he called “the modern economy” upon the power of the governments of Europe: even an absolute monarch could not damage public credit without destroying his own sovereignty.