Inter‐laboratory Characterisation of Apatite Reference Materials for Oxygen Isotope Analysis and Associated Methodological Considerations
Fiche du document
- doi: 10.1111/ggr.12416
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/ggr.12416
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1639-4488
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1751-908X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_44F14FD3F8648
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Mots-clés
secondary ion mass spectrometry, TC/EA, laser fluorination, thermogravimetry, infrared spectroscopyCiter ce document
Alicja Wudarska et al., « Inter‐laboratory Characterisation of Apatite Reference Materials for Oxygen Isotope Analysis and Associated Methodological Considerations », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1111/ggr.12416
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Here we report on the oxygen isotope compositions of four proposed apatite reference materials (chlorapatite MGMH#133648 and fluorapatite specimens MGMH#128441A, MZ-TH and ES-MM). The samples were initially screened for 18O/16O homogeneity using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) followed by δ18O determinations in six gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry laboratories (GS-IRMS) using a variety of analytical protocols for determining either phosphate-bonded or “bulk” oxygen compositions. We also report preliminary δ17O and Δ’17O data, major and trace element compositions collected using EPMA, as well as CO32− and OH− contents in the apatite structure assessed using thermogravimetric analysis and infrared spectroscopy. The repeatability of our SIMS measurements was better than ± 0.25 ‰ (1s) for all four materials that cover a wide range of 103δ18O values between +5.8 and +21.7. The GS-IRMS results show, however, a significant offset of 103δ18O values between the “phosphate” and “bulk” analyses that could not be correlated with chemical characteristics of the studied samples. Therefore, we provide two sets of working values specific to these two classes of analytical methodologies as well as current working values for SIMS data calibration.