The AirView Study: Comparison of Intubation Conditions and Ease between the Airtraq-AirView and the King Vision.

Fiche du document

Date

2015

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1155/2015/284142

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/26161393

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2314-6141

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C2181B7F46DE7

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer


Sujets proches En

Eyesight Seeing Sight

Citer ce document

P. Schoettker et al., « The AirView Study: Comparison of Intubation Conditions and Ease between the Airtraq-AirView and the King Vision. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1155/2015/284142


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

We conducted a study assessing the quality and speed of intubation between the Airtraq with its new iPhone AirView app and the King Vision in a manikin. The primary endpoint was reduction of time needed for intubation. Secondary endpoints included times necessary for intubation. 30 anaesthetists randomly performed 3 intubations with each device on a difficult airway manikin. Participants had a professional experience of 12 years: 60.0% possessed the Airtraq in their hospital, 46.7% the King Vision, and 20.0% both. Median time difference [IQR] to identify glottis (1.1 [-1.3; 3.9] P = 0.019), for tube insertion (2.1 [-2.6; 9.4] P = 0.002) and lung ventilation (2.8 [-2.4; 11.5] P = 0.001), was shorter with the Airtraq-AirView. Median time for glottis visualization was significantly shorter with the Airtraq-AirView (5.3 [4.0; 8.4] versus 6.4 [4.6; 9.1]). Cormack Lehane before intubation was better with the King Vision (P = 0.03); no difference was noted during intubation, for subjective device insertion or quality of epiglottis visualisation. Assessment of tracheal tube insertion was better with the Airtraq-AirView. The Airtraq-AirView allows faster identification of the landmarks and intubation in a difficult airway manikin, while clinical relevance remains to be studied. Anaesthetists assessed the intubation better with the Airtraq-AirView.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en