Fiche du document
2013
- doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-91
- issn: 1471-2105
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1471-2105-14-91
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/23497356
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1471-2105
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_896EC7B824421
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Instruction and study--Methods Instruction and study--MethodsCiter ce document
C. Soneson et al., « A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1186/1471-2105-14-91
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Finding genes that are differentially expressed between conditions is an integral part of understanding the molecular basis of phenotypic variation. In the past decades, DNA microarrays have been used extensively to quantify the abundance of mRNA corresponding to different genes, and more recently high-throughput sequencing of cDNA (RNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful competitor. As the cost of sequencing decreases, it is conceivable that the use of RNA-seq for differential expression analysis will increase rapidly. To exploit the possibilities and address the challenges posed by this relatively new type of data, a number of software packages have been developed especially for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. RESULTS: We conducted an extensive comparison of eleven methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. All methods are freely available within the R framework and take as input a matrix of counts, i.e. the number of reads mapping to each genomic feature of interest in each of a number of samples. We evaluate the methods based on both simulated data and real RNA-seq data. CONCLUSIONS: Very small sample sizes, which are still common in RNA-seq experiments, impose problems for all evaluated methods and any results obtained under such conditions should be interpreted with caution. For larger sample sizes, the methods combining a variance-stabilizing transformation with the 'limma' method for differential expression analysis perform well under many different conditions, as does the nonparametric SAMseq method.