Interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working with adults with low back pain in Québec's private sector: results of a qualitative study.
Fiche du document
2014
- doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-160
- issn: 1471-2474
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1471-2474-15-160
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24884757
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1471-2474
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_E1BD0BCF455C9
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
PhysiotherapistsCiter ce document
K. Perreault et al., « Interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working with adults with low back pain in Québec's private sector: results of a qualitative study. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1186/1471-2474-15-160
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Collaboration and interprofessional practices are highly valued in health systems, because they are thought to improve outcomes of care for persons with complex health problems, such as low back pain. Physiotherapists, like all health providers, are encouraged to take part in interprofessional practices. However, little is known about these practices, especially for private sector physiotherapists. This study aimed to: 1) explore how physiotherapists working in the private sector with adults with low back pain describe their interprofessional practices, 2) identify factors that influence their interprofessional practices, and 3) identify their perceived effects. METHODS: Participants were 13 physiotherapists, 10 women/3 men, having between 3 and 21 years of professional experience. For this descriptive qualitative study, we used face-to-face semi-structured interviews and conducted content analysis encompassing data coding and thematic regrouping. RESULTS: Physiotherapists described interprofessional practices heterogeneously, including numerous processes such as sharing information and referring. Factors that influenced physiotherapists' interprofessional practices were related to patients, providers, organizations, and wider systems (e.g. professional system). Physiotherapists mostly viewed positive effects of interprofessional practices, including elements such as gaining new knowledge as a provider and being valued in one's own role, as well as improvements in overall treatment and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study offers new insights into the interprofessional practices of physiotherapists working with adults with low back pain, as perceived by the physiotherapists' themselves. Based on the results, the development of strategies aiming to increase interprofessionalism in the management of low back pain would most likely require taking into consideration factors associated with patients, providers, the organizations within which they work, and the wider systems.
