Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis.
Fiche du document
2014
- doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71
- issn: 1472-6947
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1472-6947-14-71
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/25106844
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1472-6947
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_382A1CC7824D8
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Mots-clés
Bibliometrics; Decision Making; Humans; Journal Impact Factor; Periodicals as Topic/trendsSujets proches
Published materialCiter ce document
X. Blanc et al., « Publication trends of shared decision making in 15 high impact medical journals: a full-text review with bibliometric analysis. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1186/1472-6947-14-71
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Shared Decision Making (SDM) is increasingly advocated as a model for medical decision making. However, there is still low use of SDM in clinical practice. High impact factor journals might represent an efficient way for its dissemination. We aimed to identify and characterize publication trends of SDM in 15 high impact medical journals. METHODS: We selected the 15 general and internal medicine journals with the highest impact factor publishing original articles, letters and editorials. We retrieved publications from 1996 to 2011 through the full-text search function on each journal website and abstracted bibliometric data. We included publications of any type containing the phrase "shared decision making" or five other variants in their abstract or full text. These were referred to as SDM publications. A polynomial Poisson regression model with logarithmic link function was used to assess the evolution across the period of the number of SDM publications according to publication characteristics. RESULTS: We identified 1285 SDM publications out of 229,179 publications in 15 journals from 1996 to 2011. The absolute number of SDM publications by journal ranged from 2 to 273 over 16 years. SDM publications increased both in absolute and relative numbers per year, from 46 (0.32% relative to all publications from the 15 journals) in 1996 to 165 (1.17%) in 2011. This growth was exponential (P
