Fiche du document
2009
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1757-7241-17-39
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/19723331
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1757-7241[electronic], 1757-7241[linking]
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_1C39F0C5D6753
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Doctors Doctors of medicine MDs (Physicians) Medical doctors Allopathic doctors Medical profession MistakesCiter ce document
C. Heim et al., « Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1186/1757-7241-17-39
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: To assess the theoretical and practical knowledge of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) by trained Air-rescue physicians in Switzerland. METHODS: Prospective anonymous observational study with a specially designed questionnaire. General knowledge of the GCS and its use in a clinical case were assessed. RESULTS: From 130 questionnaires send out, 103 were returned (response rate of 79.2%) and analyzed. Theoretical knowledge of the GCS was consistent for registrars, fellows, consultants and private practitioners active in physician-staffed helicopters. The clinical case was wrongly scored by 38 participants (36.9%). Wrong evaluation of the motor component occurred in 28 questionnaires (27.2%), and 19 errors were made for the verbal score (18.5%). Errors were made most frequently by registrars (47.5%, p = 0.09), followed by fellows (31.6%, p = 0.67) and private practitioners (18.4%, p = 1.00). Consultants made significantly less errors than the rest of the participating physicians (0%, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were shown between anesthetists, general practitioners, internal medicine trainees or others. CONCLUSION: Although the theoretical knowledge of the GCS by out-of-hospital physicians is correct, significant errors were made in scoring a clinical case. Less experienced physicians had a higher rate of errors. Further emphasis on teaching the GCS is mandatory.