Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Fiche du document
1 décembre 2016
- doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6
- issn: 1471-2482
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/27905910
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1471-2482
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_5C951FAA1FBC2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
AchesCiter ce document
F. Grass et al., « Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1186/s12893-016-0194-6
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the accepted standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized approach with tailored care maps for pre- and postoperative care by comparing pain, nausea and patient satisfaction after elective and emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From January 2014 until April 2015, data on pain and nausea management were prospectively recorded for all elective and emergency procedures in the department of visceral surgery. This prospective observational study compared consecutive laparoscopic elective vs. emergency cholecystectomies. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to measure pain, nausea, and satisfaction from recovery room until 96 hours postoperatively. Final analysis included 168 (79%) elective cholecystectomies and 44 (21%) emergent procedures. Demographics (Age, gender, BMI and ASA-scores) were comparable between the 2 groups. In the emergency group, patients did not receive anxiolytic medication (0% vs.13%, p = 0.009) and less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (77% vs. 97% p =