Predictive value of clinical and laboratory features for the main febrile diseases in children living in Tanzania: A prospective observational study.

Fiche du document

Date

2017

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0173314

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/28464021

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1932-6203

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_FA5A5C75DE071

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer


Sujets proches En

illness

Citer ce document

O. De Santis et al., « Predictive value of clinical and laboratory features for the main febrile diseases in children living in Tanzania: A prospective observational study. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1371/journal.pone.0173314


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

To construct evidence-based guidelines for management of febrile illness, it is essential to identify clinical predictors for the main causes of fever, either to diagnose the disease when no laboratory test is available or to better target testing when a test is available. The objective was to investigate clinical predictors of several diseases in a cohort of febrile children attending outpatient clinics in Tanzania, whose diagnoses have been established after extensive clinical and laboratory workup. From April to December 2008, 1005 consecutive children aged 2 months to 10 years with temperature ≥38°C attending two outpatient clinics in Dar es Salaam were included. Demographic characteristics, symptoms and signs, comorbidities, full blood count and liver enzyme level were investigated by bi- and multi-variate analyses (Chan, et al., 2008). To evaluate accuracy of combined predictors to construct algorithms, classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were also performed. 62 variables were studied. Between 4 and 15 significant predictors to rule in (aLR+>1) or rule out (aLR+

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en