8 décembre 2020
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1556/2006.2020.00083
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/33289693
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2063-5303
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_28DB082AFB8F0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
V. Starcevic et al., « "Diagnostic inflation" will not resolve taxonomical problems in the study of addictive online behaviours. •. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1556/2006.2020.00083
This article suggests that the type of Internet-enabled device should not be prioritised when conceptualizing diagnostic categories of addictive online behaviours. The diagnostic distinction between "predominantly mobile" and "predominantly non-mobile" forms of Internet use disorders (IUD) is not empirically based, may not be clinically useful and may lead to "diagnostic inflation." Problems with the concepts of smartphone use disorder and IUD on which the proposed distinction is largely based call for their re-examination. Future proposals for the taxonomy of addictive behaviours may not need to be based on online/offline and mobile/non-mobile dichotomies.