Thinking beyond cut-off scores in the assessment of potentially addictive behaviors: A brief illustration in the context of binge-watching
Fiche du document
2023
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1556/2006.2023.00032
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/37384565
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2062-5871
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2063-5303
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_F9661516D2D32
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY-NC 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Sujets proches
Tally sticks Scores Notched sticksCiter ce document
Pauline Billaux et al., « Thinking beyond cut-off scores in the assessment of potentially addictive behaviors: A brief illustration in the context of binge-watching », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1556/2006.2023.00032
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
While applying a diagnostic approach (i.e., comparing “clinical” cases with “healthy” controls) is part of our methodological habits as researchers and clinicians, this approach has been particularly criticized in the behavioral addictions research field, in which a lot of studies are conducted on “emerging” conditions. Here we exemplify the pitfalls of using a cut-off-based approach in the context of binge-watching (i.e., watching multiple episodes of series back-to-back) by demonstrating that no reliable cut-off scores could be determined with a widely used assessment instrument measuring binge-watching.