Fiche du document
2014
- doi: 10.2190/IL.22.3.d
- issn: 1552-6968
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2190/IL.22.3.d
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1054-1373
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_1261861E1F793
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Still-birth Late fetal death Infants (Stillborn)Citer ce document
L. Campbell-Jackson et al., « The psychological impact of stillbirth on women: a systematic review. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.2190/IL.22.3.d
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This systematic review explored the psychological impact of stillbirth (from 20 weeks gestation) on mothers. A search was conducted in the National Library for Health and Web of Science, Cochrane Review, and Google Scholar. A secondary search based on results from the preliminary search was undertaken. A systematic search identified 26 articles (8 qualitative, 18 quantitative studies), which met criteria and were reviewed according to guidelines. The findings revealed that stillbirth is a distressing experience that can result in high levels of psychological symptoms including anxiety, depression, distress, and negative well-being. Symptoms appear to be highest in the first few months post loss although there is evidence to suggest that for some, symptoms may persist up to 3 years. The long-lasting impact of stillbirth on women was echoed in the qualitative research. Risk factors for higher levels of anxious and depressive symptoms included higher parity at the time of loss and not being married. Social support in particular was identified to be beneficial for women post loss. Longitudinal studies utilizing designs which permit causality to be determined are required to explore the specific experience of stillbirth. Further exploration of risk and protective factors, cultural beliefs, and the impact on partner relationships is needed. Clinical implications of the findings are discussed in light of current guidance.