16 décembre 2017
Ce document est lié à :
https://revistas.uma.es/index.php/shegel/article/v [...]
Ce document est lié à :
10.24310/Studiahegelianastheg.v0i.3695.3445
Derechos de autor 2017 STUDIA HEGELIANA
Miquel Beltrán, « Futilidad de ciertos argumentos contra el acosmismo de Spinoza An Account of the weakness of certain Arguments against the acosmist Doctrine of Spinoza », Studia Hegeliana. Journal of the Spanish Society for Hegelian Studies, ID : 10.24310/stheg.v0i1.3695
As the title of this paper indicates, we will try to give an account of the weakness of certain arguments that have recently been put forward to prove that Spinoza’s Ethics does not contain an acosmist doctrine. Inversely, we maintain that this alleged impossibility is based on a misunderstanding of what is God in the Ethics (a substance that constitutes itself as an essence just to be grasped by infinite and finite intellects), due to the ignorance of the influence of Kabbalah on Spinoza’s metaphysics.