Fiche du document
15 juillet 2019
- doi: 10.3233/jem-190461
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3233/jem-190461
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0747-9662
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1875-8932
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_F5056225A9DC7
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Mots-clés
General Social SciencesSujets proches
Fortunes Riches Affluence Distribution of wealthCiter ce document
Laura Ravazzini et al., « Comparison of survey data on wealth in Switzerland », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3233/jem-190461
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Beyond income, wealth is one of most relevant components among national and international indicators of household finances. Three surveys that include Switzerland have recently integrated questions about wealth and its components. These surveys are the Swiss Household Panel -SHP- (2016), the Statistics on Income and Living Conditions -CH-SILC- (2015), and the Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe -SHARE- (2015). Following three important criteria suggested by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), namely relevance, coherence and accuracy, this study systematically compares data on housing and financial wealth. The analysis addresses question wording, the comparison with national accounts and accuracy. Results suggest that SHARE is the most relevant survey in terms of financial wealth and total net worth. CH-SILC is a coherent survey that allows for additional analysis on subjective living conditions, while the SHP is an ecological survey in terms of the number of questions on wealth.