Examining the virulence of Candida albicans transcription factor mutants using Galleria mellonella and mouse infection models.
Fiche du document
2015
- doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00367
- issn: 1664-302X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00367
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/25999923
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1664-302X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_777D65B6ECFD2
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Mouse House mice Mus musculus House mouseCiter ce document
S. Amorim-Vaz et al., « Examining the virulence of Candida albicans transcription factor mutants using Galleria mellonella and mouse infection models. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00367
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The aim of the present study was to identify Candida albicans transcription factors (TFs) involved in virulence. Although mice are considered the gold-standard model to study fungal virulence, mini-host infection models have been increasingly used. Here, barcoded TF mutants were first screened in mice by pools of strains and fungal burdens (FBs) quantified in kidneys. Mutants of unannotated genes which generated a kidney FB significantly different from that of wild-type were selected and individually examined in Galleria mellonella. In addition, mutants that could not be detected in mice were also tested in G. mellonella. Only 25% of these mutants displayed matching phenotypes in both hosts, highlighting a significant discrepancy between the two models. To address the basis of this difference (pool or host effects), a set of 19 mutants tested in G. mellonella were also injected individually into mice. Matching FB phenotypes were observed in 50% of the cases, highlighting the bias due to host effects. In contrast, 33.4% concordance was observed between pool and single strain infections in mice, thereby highlighting the bias introduced by the "pool effect." After filtering the results obtained from the two infection models, mutants for MBF1 and ZCF6 were selected. Independent marker-free mutants were subsequently tested in both hosts to validate previous results. The MBF1 mutant showed impaired infection in both models, while the ZCF6 mutant was only significant in mice infections. The two mutants showed no obvious in vitro phenotypes compared with the wild-type, indicating that these genes might be specifically involved in in vivo adapt.