Statistical adhockeries are no criteria for legal decisions – The case of the expert medical report on the assessment of urine specimens collected among athletes having participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games
Fiche du document
20 août 2018
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00025
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2297-7775
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_62E6513F3EE87
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Mots-clés
legal decision making, doping in sports, statistics, forensic interpretation, Olympic GamesSujets proches
Examples Exemplars Statistical data Cases, clinical reports, statistics Olympic games (Winter) Winter Olympic Games Pee Statistical data Statistical analysis Statistical methods Statistical science Olympic games Games, Olympic Summer Olympics Case Assessment Drugs in sports Decision (Psychology) Decision processes Making decisions Decision analysis Management--Decision making Deciding Management decisions Sports persons Sportspersons Sportspeople Assessment, Tax Assessment Property tax--Assessment Real property tax--Assessment Assessed valuationCiter ce document
Franco Taroni et al., « Statistical adhockeries are no criteria for legal decisions – The case of the expert medical report on the assessment of urine specimens collected among athletes having participated to the Vancouver and Sochi Winter Olympic Games », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00025
