Diagnostic Performances of an Occupational Burnout Detection Method Designed for Healthcare Professionals.
Fiche du document
23 novembre 2021
- doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312300
- issn: 1660-4601
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/ijerph182312300
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/34886022
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1660-4601
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_95DCD8C9856B4
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sujets proches
Semiology (Medicine) Diseases--Symptoms Symptomatology Signs, Clinical Clinical signs Semiology Symptomology Signs and symptoms Disease symptoms Trustworthiness DependabilityCiter ce document
A. Nguyen Huynh et al., « Diagnostic Performances of an Occupational Burnout Detection Method Designed for Healthcare Professionals. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3390/ijerph182312300
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
We aimed to assess the validity (criterion and cross-cultural validity) and reliability of the first occupational burnout (OB) detection tool designed for healthcare professionals in Belgium in the context of Swiss medical practice. First, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the Tool. We developed this tool based on the consultation reports of 42 patients and compared its detection to the results of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), filled-in by patients before a consultation. Second, we performed an inter-rater reliability (IRR) assessment on the OB symptoms and detection reached by the Tool between a psychiatrist, two psychologists, and an occupational physician. The Tool correctly identified over 80% of patients with OB, regardless of the cutoff value used for OLBI scores, reflecting its high sensitivity. Conversely, its specificity strongly varied depending on the OLBI cutoff. There was a slight to fair overall agreement between the four raters on the detection of OB and the number of OB symptoms. Around 41% of symptoms showed a substantial to an almost perfect agreement, and 36% showed a slight to a moderate agreement. The Tool seems useful for identifying OB of moderate and strong severity in both the Belgian and Swiss contexts.