Response and Resistance to Trametinib in MAP2K1-Mutant Triple-Negative Melanoma.

Fiche du document

Date

24 février 2023

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/ijms24054520

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/36901951

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1422-0067

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_E3A48A3138B74

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/




Citer ce document

F.S. Krebs et al., « Response and Resistance to Trametinib in MAP2K1-Mutant Triple-Negative Melanoma. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3390/ijms24054520


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

The development of targeted therapies for non-BRAF p.Val600-mutant melanomas remains a challenge. Triple wildtype (TWT) melanomas that lack mutations in BRAF, NRAS, or NF1 form 10% of human melanomas and are heterogeneous in their genomic drivers. MAP2K1 mutations are enriched in BRAF-mutant melanoma and function as an innate or adaptive resistance mechanism to BRAF inhibition. Here we report the case of a patient with TWT melanoma with a bona fide MAP2K1 mutation without any BRAF mutations. We performed a structural analysis to validate that the MEK inhibitor trametinib could block this mutation. Although the patient initially responded to trametinib, he eventually progressed. The presence of a CDKN2A deletion prompted us to combine a CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, with trametinib but without clinical benefit. Genomic analysis at progression showed multiple novel copy number alterations. Our case illustrates the challenges of combining MEK1 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in case of resistance to MEK inhibitor monotherapy.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en