Fiche du document
14 novembre 2018
- doi: 10.3390/nu10111758
- issn: 2072-6643
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/nu10111758
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/30441792
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2072-6643
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_5AE5749F4CF51
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Citer ce document
F. Grass et al., « Ordering a Normal Diet at the End of Surgery-Justified or Overhasty? », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3390/nu10111758
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Early re-alimentation is advocated by enhanced recovery pathways (ERP). This study aimed to assess compliance to ERP-set early re-alimentation policy and to compare outcomes of early fed patients and patients in whom early feeding was withhold due to the independent decision making of the surgeon. For this purpose, demographic, surgical and outcome data of all consecutive elective colorectal surgical procedures (2011⁻2016) were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional ERP database. The primary endpoint was postoperative ileus (POI). Surgical 30-day outcome and length of stay were compared between patients undergoing the pathway-intended early re-alimentation pattern and patients in whom early re-alimentation was not compliant. Out of the 7103 patients included, 1241 (17.4%) were not compliant with ERP re-alimentation. Patients with delayed re-alimentation presented with more postoperative complications (37 vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and a prolonged length of hospital stay (8 ± 7 vs. 5 ± 4 days, p < 0.001). While male gender (odds ratio (OR) 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04⁻1.32), fluid overload (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.16⁻1.65) and high American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27⁻1.8) were independent risk factors for POI, laparoscopy (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.38⁻0.68) and ERP compliant diet (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.36⁻0.6) were both protective. Hence, this study provides further evidence of the beneficial effect of early oral feeding after colorectal surgery.