Fiche du document
1 février 2022
- doi: 10.3390/nu14030635
- issn: 2072-6643
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/nu14030635
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/35276994
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2072-6643
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_7C34A16CB6E81
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sujets proches
Assessment Assessment, Tax Assessment Property tax--Assessment Real property tax--Assessment Assessed valuationCiter ce document
C. Zuppinger et al., « Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.3390/nu14030635
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Digital dietary assessment devices could help overcome the limitations of traditional tools to assess dietary intake in clinical and/or epidemiological studies. We evaluated the accuracy of the automated dietary app MyFoodRepo (MFR) against controlled reference values from weighted food diaries (WFD). MFR's capability to identify, classify and analyze the content of 189 different records was assessed using Cohen and uniform kappa coefficients and linear regressions. MFR identified 98.0% ± 1.5 of all edible components and was not affected by increasing numbers of ingredients. Linear regression analysis showed wide limits of agreement between MFR and WFD methods to estimate energy, carbohydrates, fat, proteins, fiber and alcohol contents of all records and a constant overestimation of proteins, likely reflecting the overestimation of portion sizes for meat, fish and seafood. The MFR mean portion size error was 9.2% ± 48.1 with individual errors ranging between -88.5% and +242.5% compared to true values. Beverages were impacted by the app's difficulty in correctly identifying the nature of liquids (41.9% ± 17.7 of composed beverages correctly classified). Fair estimations of portion size by MFR, along with its strong segmentation and classification capabilities, resulted in a generally good agreement between MFR and WFD which would be suited for the identification of dietary patterns, eating habits and regime types.