Le consulat de France à Larnaca à la fin de la Monarchie de Juillet. Correspondance de Dagobert Fourcade et Théodore Goepp (1840-1849). IV : La Justice. Les affaires du Sieur Georges Diab
Fiche du document
2008
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Sujets proches
Correspondence, reminiscences, etc Letters Correspondence, reminiscences, etc Letters Kingdom (Monarchy) Injustice Trade French Republic Arte epistolar Cartas españolas--Redacción Cartas privadas--Redacción Modelos de cartas Redacción de cartas Cartas literarias Correspondencia Epistolarios Consulat Rédaction de lettres Correspondance privée Relations épistolaires Courrier (correspondance) Épistolographie Missives Art épistolaire Échanges épistolaires Secrétaires (recueils de lettres) Lettres (correspondance) Justice et droit Injustice (science politique) Justice (science politique) Droit et justice Justice (droit) Injustice (droit) Royauté Souverains Gouvernement monarchique République française Royaume de France Royaume de France (987-1791)Citer ce document
Lucie Bonato, « Le consulat de France à Larnaca à la fin de la Monarchie de Juillet. Correspondance de Dagobert Fourcade et Théodore Goepp (1840-1849). IV : La Justice. Les affaires du Sieur Georges Diab », Cahiers du Centre d’Études Chypriotes, ID : 10.3406/cchyp.2008.901
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The Capitulations allowed foreigners to escape the Ottoman law, thus leaving to the consular C ourts the right to judge their own nationals. The F rench law of 28 May 1836 assigned to this jurisdiction the task to arbitrate on first hearing any kind of disputes, torts, crimes, and commercial offences occurring among the F rench. The C ourt was also able to judge those protected by F rance as far as they accepted referral to the arbitration of the C onsulate. Thus, Fourcade and Goepp, and later their successors, had to resolve the extremely confused affairs of the “ Sieur” Georges D iab who had the favored status of barataire protected by F rance.