«Qui peut définir les femmes ?». L'idée de la «nature féminine» au siècle des Lumières

Fiche du document

Date

1994

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Lieselotte Steinbrügge, « «Qui peut définir les femmes ?». L'idée de la «nature féminine» au siècle des Lumières », Dix-Huitième Siècle, ID : 10.3406/dhs.1994.1994


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Lieselotte Steinbrugge : Who can define woman ? The idea of feminine nature in the Enlightenment. For 18th-century thinkers, the nature of woman was the subject of medical, historiographical, anthropological, philosophical and literary discourse, some com mon aspects of which are outlined here. The Encyclopédie (faithful to the 17th-century tradition of Poulain de la Barre) reflects the transition from en egalitarian position to a discourse that treats the relationship between the sexes in terms of difference. Around the mid-century the shift from rationalism to sensualism had profound effects on female anthropology. This is shown in Dr Pierre Roussel' s Système physique et moral de la femme (1775) which claims that woman, because of her physical constitution, is intellectually inferior to man. Through an analysis of the 5th chapter of Emile in the context of the two Discours, the author aims at showing that for Rousseau the image of woman is linked to the idea of rationality and to his anthropological system.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en