Fin, finalité, finalisme. Le rôle de l'imaginaire chez Rousseau et Bernardin de Saint-Pierre

Fiche du document

Date

2001

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Michel Soëtard, « Fin, finalité, finalisme. Le rôle de l'imaginaire chez Rousseau et Bernardin de Saint-Pierre », Dix-Huitième Siècle, ID : 10.3406/dhs.2001.2440


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Rousseau's epistemological revolution can be seen as a transformation of the status of finality for humans. Its basis in nature is there only to justify liberty, which is now the sole responsibility of humans, and nature, based on imagination, is only its vehicle, where liberty and reality ought to be finally reconciled. Education should be in imagination the route to this reconciliation. Bernardin de Saint-Pierre, Rousseau's generous disciple, disrupts this subtle dialectic reconciling in the imagination the aim of liberty and natural finality, and adopts a finalism which absorbs everything in Nature as Providence, both natura naturata and natura naturans. Liberty, the prisoner of this organic harmony, is now only another name for nature. Education loses all grip on reality and all fictional power. The romantic imagination is on the horizon, finally replacing reason and the reasoning power of humans over nature.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en