Convertibilité ou intégration ?

Fiche du document

Date

1954

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2024. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Robert Triffin, « Convertibilité ou intégration ? », Économie appliquée (documents), ID : 10.3406/ecoap.1954.3854


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Monetary convertibility and economic integration are complementary rather than alternative objectives. Full convertibility implies the absence of both exchange control and trade restrictions. It is thus equivalent to free trade , and impossible in practice. Workable convertibility is defined by the free arbitrage between currencies and the absence of discriminatory trade restrictions. It is antagonistic to bilateralism. Thus defined , convertibility requires some degree of integration of the monetary and economic policies of the main countries. This is necessary to avoid both the danger of unemployment and the risk of any one country reaping the benefits of making its currency inconvertible , when other currencies remain convertible. In practice, worldwide integration would be clumsy and unnecessary. There is therefore wide scope for regional arrangements. Even then, mone¬ tary integration may call for some degree of political integration. The paper ends by suggesting some lines along which intra-European monetary institutions and policies should be modified so as to reach the objective of convertibility.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines