The Evolving Politics of Sovereign Wealth Funds

Fiche du document

Date

2009

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Laura Badian et al., « The Evolving Politics of Sovereign Wealth Funds », Revue d'économie financière, ID : 10.3406/ecofi.2009.5501


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) can provide needed liquidity and stabilize equity markets. Countries that are open ta investment by SWFs are likely to benefit from their participation. Countries, such as France, that adopt protectionist policies, may see a dramatic fall-off in foreign direct investment, which is likely to be harmful to their economy at the worst possible time. The adoption by SWFs of the Santiago Principles, a voluntary set of principles without the force of law, is unlikely to forestall tougher regulation by recipient countries that conclude that increased regulation of such funds is in their best interest. In the United States, the Obama administration and a Democratic-controlled Congress are likely to subject financial institutions, including private equity and hedge funds, to increased regulation. In this environment, SWFs may be unable to escape tighter regulation. If SWFs do not actively engage policy makers, they could be left with stricter rules and fewer investment options. JEL Classification : F21, F30, G11

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en