Légitimité sociologique et analyse de discours : Le parcours de la légitimité dans les textes de l'Unesco sur l'éducation de base

Fiche du document

Date

1986

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.




Citer ce document

François Leimdorfer et al., « Légitimité sociologique et analyse de discours : Le parcours de la légitimité dans les textes de l'Unesco sur l'éducation de base », Langage & société, ID : 10.3406/lsoc.1986.2067


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En Fr

Leimdorfer François, Tessonneau Alex-Louise, "Sociological legitimacy and discourse analysis : How legitimacy is built up in UNESCO texts". The authors start reflecting upon the legitimacy concept in sociology (Weber, Habermas, Bourdieu), then proceed to analyzing UNESCO texts by trying to evince legitimizing operations as well as the presupposed legitimacy. This analysis is centered round reported speech, referenciation to discourse being external, the use of completives, relatives and infinitive sentences in a program pronouncement of the Executive Council, and the interplay on "on" ("one") and "nous" ("we") in a Director General report. The most important hypotheses in this analysis are, one, the strong relationship between implicit (not said) legitimacy, presupposed (i.e. present in the discourse) legitimacy, and its very enonciation ; two, the refering to the world and to an external "duty" as legitimizing operations.

Leimdorfer François, Tessonneau Alex-Louise, "Sociological legitimacy and discourse analysis : How legitimacy is built up in UNESCO texts". The authors start reflecting upon the legitimacy concept in sociology (Weber, Habermas, Bourdieu), then proceed to analyzing UNESCO texts by trying to evince legitimizing operations as well as the presupposed legitimacy. This analysis is centered round reported speech, referenciation to discourse being external, the use of completives, relatives and infinitive sentences in a program pronouncement of the Executive Council, and the interplay on "on" ("one") and "nous" ("we") in a Director General report. The most important hypotheses in this analysis are, one, the strong relationship between implicit (not said) legitimacy, presupposed (i.e. present in the discourse) legitimacy, and its very enonciation ; two, the refering to the world and to an external "duty" as legitimizing operations.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en