Les analyses concurrentes de la société de marché postcommuniste. Retour sur le passé d'une controverse

Fiche du document

Date

2000

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.



Citer ce document

Béla Greskovits, « Les analyses concurrentes de la société de marché postcommuniste. Retour sur le passé d'une controverse », Revue française de science politique, ID : 10.3406/rfsp.2000.395504


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En Fr

Rival views of post-communist market society. the path dependence of transitology By reviewing the debate on the political consequences of capitalist expansion and the impact of the communist legacy on the emerging East European market societies, the author demons­trates that the manner social scientists think about post-communism has much in common with the ideas of their predecessors who faced the emergence of capitalism over the past centuries. Neither the specific historical nor the systemic context of capitalist expansion can fully account for the continuity of the major views and their conflict. Rather rivalry is the standard way social scientists think about systems and systemic change in general. However, the trench-war between rival views of post-communist market society also reflects the impact of new psycholo­gical, political, and institutional factors specific to the mass-production of social science ideas towards the end of the 20th century.

Rival views of post-communist market society. the path dependence of transitology By reviewing the debate on the political consequences of capitalist expansion and the impact of the communist legacy on the emerging East European market societies, the author demons­trates that the manner social scientists think about post-communism has much in common with the ideas of their predecessors who faced the emergence of capitalism over the past centuries. Neither the specific historical nor the systemic context of capitalist expansion can fully account for the continuity of the major views and their conflict. Rather rivalry is the standard way social scientists think about systems and systemic change in general. However, the trench-war between rival views of post-communist market society also reflects the impact of new psycholo­gical, political, and institutional factors specific to the mass-production of social science ideas towards the end of the 20th century.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en