Fiche du document
1 juin 2017
- doi: 10.4000/books.pufr.4862
- isbn: 9782869062238
- eisbn: 9782869064799
https://www.openedition.org/12554 , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Doctrinal and controversial works Natural science Sciences Science of science Linguistic science Science of language Erythrocytes--Sedimentation Erythrocyte sedimentation Blood sedimentation ESR (Hematology) Erythrocyte sedimentation rate Signifiant Sémantique Vitesse de sédimentation érythrocytaire VSG Vitesse de sédimentation Vitesse de sédimentation des hématies Vitesse de sédimentation sanguine Temps de sédimentation VS Grammaire universelle Grammaire philosophique Grammaire générale Théorie grammaticale Possibilité (logique) Possible Impossible Possibilité (philosophie) Impossibilité Et la logique Contribution à la logique Science du langage Théorie linguistique Sciences du langage Théories linguistiques Langage, Science duCiter ce document
Henri Le Prieult, « Tradition vs. Modernité : doit-on nier la grammaire pour la faire ? », Presses universitaires François-Rabelais, ID : 10.4000/books.pufr.4862
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Even though histories of science are more often than not written by the “victors of scientific warfare” (Murray 1994), one should be able to make as objective and acute an analysis of scientific rhetoric as possible. Based mainly on the detailed analysis of three examples of the scientific rhetorical negation of linguistic doctrines (Sextus Empiricus Against the Professors, Chomsky’s Cartesian linguistics and the debate beween Adamczewki and Boisson in 1999-2001), this paper attempts to give an account of the major devices used in the scientific debate in order to contradict, oppose and undermine an opponent’s theory.