Does Art Think? From Dutch Still Lifes to the Critical Power of Dysfunctional Machines

Fiche du document

Date

3 décembre 2021

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1246-8258

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2265-9404

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess



Citer ce document

Muriel van Vliet, « Does Art Think? From Dutch Still Lifes to the Critical Power of Dysfunctional Machines », Critique d’art, ID : 10.4000/critiquedart.85175


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Following its initial focus on the objectivity of artworks, led by classical 17th-century thinkers Nicolas Boileau and the Abbé Batteux, who adopted a normative view of art as imitation of la Belle Nature; in the 18th century, aesthetics conversely came to characterise the fully subjective experience of artworks – from the viewpoint of the artist and the viewer. This was theorised as the aesthetics of feeling by a certain David Hume, relying on the viewer’s senses recording impressions as sen...

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en