Preformation vs. Epigenesis: Inspiration and Haunting Within and Outside Contemporary Philosophy of Biology
Fiche du document
23 février 2021
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0035-6212
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2421-5864
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Knowledge--Philosophy Mental philosophyCiter ce document
Elena Casetta, « Preformation vs. Epigenesis: Inspiration and Haunting Within and Outside Contemporary Philosophy of Biology », Rivista di estetica, ID : 10.4000/estetica.7088
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The 17th and 18th centuries were the theatre of the fight between two main theories concerning the development of organisms: preformationism (or preformism) and epigeneticism (or epigenesis). According to the first, the formation of new features during organisms’ development can be seen as the result of a mere unfolding of features that were preformed in the sperm, the egg, or the zygote. According to epigeneticism, there is no pre-existing form, and development is a process where genuinely new characters emerge from formless matter. The debate involved naturalists, anatomists, physiologists, microscopists, medical doctors, and philosophers as well. Current developmental biology is, according to some, still inspired (or haunted) by the age-old controversy. The aim of this contribution is twofold. First, to discuss in which guise, if any, the old controversy is still shaping the contemporary debate in biology and philosophy of biology; and, second, to sketch Schelling’s position on that debate, suggesting that it may contain some still valuable philosophical insight.