Fiche du document
15 mai 2019
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2275-1785
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Nomenclature Proper names TerminologyCiter ce document
David Horan, « Plato’s Parmenides in Plato’s Sophist », Études platoniciennes, ID : 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1589
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
I wish to argue in this article that Plato, in considering the position of the monists in the Sophist, relies heavily upon arguments carried forward from the Parmenides. Accordingly, I argue, he invokes, in turn, three understandings of what one means, imported from the Parmenides, and finds that all of them fall short, and generate aporiai, when they are used in the Sophist as the basis for an account, not of the one, as in the Parmenides, but of being, or “what is”. In fact I shall argue in this paper that an entirely coherent reading of the overall challenge to the monists in the Sophist, beginning with the naming argument, or names’ argument, through to the argument about the whole, only emerges if we take account of the arguments of the Parmenides, and three conceptions of what “one” is, taken from that dialogue.