Parts, Forms, and Participation in the Parmenides and Sophist: A Comparison

Fiche du document

Date

15 mai 2019

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2275-1785

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Pauline Sabrier, « Parts, Forms, and Participation in the Parmenides and Sophist: A Comparison », Études platoniciennes, ID : 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1601


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This paper addresses the vexed question of the outcome of the second horn of the dilemma of participation in Plato’s Parmenides bringing in Sophist 257c7-d5 where the Eleatic Stranger accepts what he seems to reject in the Parmenides, namely that a Form can have parts and nevertheless remain one. Comparing Plato’s treatment of parts of Forms in both passages, and in particular the relation among Being, Change and Rest at Sophist 250a8-c8, I argue that unlike in the Parmenides, in the Sophist, parts and wholes are seen as offering a structure that can explain how things that may, at first, appear unrelated nevertheless belong together.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en