Fiche du document
19 décembre 2016
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1252-6576
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1777-5388
All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Absolutism Tyranny Autocracy Hours (Time) Addresses Papers, Collected (Anthologies) Orations Collected papers (Anthologies) Discourses Social conditions Descriptive sociology Social history--Modern, 1500- Scientific research Science research Science--Research Bourgeoisie Commons (Social order) Middle class--Social conditions Middle classes Upkeep Preventive maintenance Addresses Lecturing Speaking Discourses Paws Hands Paw Article Bargains Mutual arrangements Arrangements, Mutual Concessions--Law and legislation Capital assets Fixed assets Primary sources Forerunners Primary sources Socioeconomic status Social historyCiter ce document
Tat´jana SMIRNOVA, « «Byvšie» v uslovijah NEPA : «širokie perspektivy» ili novye problemy ? », Cahiers du monde russe, ID : 10.4000/monderusse.8601
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Did members of the former bourgeoisie find “great opportunities” or new problems in the NEP?This article deals with one of the least studied aspects of Soviet social history. The author uses a large body of sources, some of which appear in scientific research for the first time. She addresses the question of the NEP’s contribution to members of the former bourgeoisie : were the “great economic opportunities” promised by the authorities real or fictitious ? To what extent did the economic concessions made to private capital go along with political concessions ? The author convincingly demonstrates that the NEP period was characterized by a constant opposition of two tendencies, economic and political liberalization on the one hand, and the maintenance (and in some cases the harshening) of ideological dictatorship on the other. Ignoring or underestimating any of these two tendencies would be an inadmissible simplification of historical reality.