International Responses to Human Protection Crises: Responsibility to Protect and the Emerging Protection Regime
Fiche du document
4 novembre 2015
- doi: 10.4000/rccsar.609
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1647-3175
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Mots-clés
human protection humanitarian crisis humanitarian intervention Security Council United NationsSujets proches
Reviews Reviews Measures Reviews Theater reviews Reviews Television plays--Reviews Television reviews Semeiotics Signs Symbolic representation Symbols Representation, Symbolic Signs Signage Guide signs Sign-boards Signs and sign-boards Guide-posts Guideposts Signs (Advertising) Signboards Obligation Accountability Moral responsibility Esteem Deference Electoral politics Political behavior Politics Mass political behavior Practical politics Political thought Government Political theory Civil government Commonwealth, The Science, Political Administration Politics Reviews Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Book section Military intervention Proof Sketch, Literary Literary sketch Book reviews Reviews Politics and suffrage Government and politics Politics Political history Use of comptabilitéCiter ce document
Alex J. Bellamy, « International Responses to Human Protection Crises: Responsibility to Protect and the Emerging Protection Regime », RCCS Annual Review, ID : 10.4000/rccsar.609
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This essay examines contemporary debates about human protection by the UN Security Council and others in response to major humanitarian crises. It argues that there are clear signs of an emerging international human protection regime in the evolving practice of the Security Council and suggests that this regime is based on an accommodation between different moral accounts of humanitarian intervention. The first section examines some of the legal and moral debates that have arisen with respect to military intervention for protection purposes. The second section briefly reviews the Security Council’s practice and reveals an emerging new politics of protection. The third section argues that although the use of force and other coercive measures remains controversial, there is evidence to suggest that the Security Council is taking its protection responsibilities more seriously in a way consistent with the emergence of a new regime.