Fiche du document
11 décembre 2020
- doi: 10.4000/revus.6527
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1581-7652
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1855-7112
All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Mots-clés
legal interpretation; speaker’s meaning; legislative intent; conversational implicatures interpretación jurídica; significado del hablante; intención legislativa; implicaturas conversacionalesSujets proches
Construction and interpretation (Law) Statutes--Interpretation and construction Statutory construction Construction and interpretation of statutes Law--Construction Interpretation and construction (Law) Analogy (Law) Analogía (Derecho) Interpretación del derecho Interpretación (Derecho) Interpretación jurídica Leyes--InterpretaciónCiter ce document
Francesca Poggi, « Contra el modelo conversacional de la interpretación jurídica », Revus, ID : 10.4000/revus.6527
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
The so-called conversational model claims that legal interpretation does not significantly differ from ordinary understanding: both are inferential processes complying with a pattern that can be traced back to Paul Grice’s thesis. This essay seeks to criticize such a claim, showing that the so-called legislative intent is not able to play the role that speaker’s intention plays in ordinary understanding and the Gricean thesis.