Fiche du document
13 décembre 2021
- doi: 10.4000/revus.7532
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1581-7652
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1855-7112
All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Legislative acts Legislative enactments Acts, Legislative Enactments, Legislative Laws (Statutes)Citer ce document
Brian H. Bix, « Coercion, function, and the “why” of law », Revus, ID : 10.4000/revus.7532
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In Coercion and the Nature of Law, Kenneth Einar Himma offers a methodical analysis of the role of coercion in understanding the nature of law. Himma’s work combines conceptual analysis, artifact theory, and functional analysis, ultimately concluding that for a social system to be “law” it must include coercive sanctions. The present article offers an overview of Himma’s arguments, ultimately focusing on the discussion about law’s function. In considering the problem of law’s function, the article contrasts Himma’s view with the views of John Finnis and Mark Greenberg.