23 septembre 2015
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4414/cvm.2015.00352
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1664-2031
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1664-204X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_D932CD2493198
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
M. Berney et al., « Clinical determinants of adrenal vein sampling success », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.4414/cvm.2015.00352
Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is one of the most prevalent forms of secondary hypertension, which may be cured by unilateral adrenalectomy. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is considered the gold-standard procedure for distinction between bilateral and unilateral aldosterone hypersecretion. However, the procedure is viewed as a technical challenge. The objectives of this study were to define the success rate of AVS, and its clinical determinants, and to compare the accuracy of high-resolution adrenal computed tomography (CT) with AVS. Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, patients with biologically proven PA who were referred for AVS between 2009 and 2014 were included. Adrenal vein catheterisation was considered selective if the selectivity index (adrenal vein / inferior vena cava cortisol) was ≥2. Results: Data from 68 patients (48% women) were available. The success rate of catheterisation in bilateral AVS was 60% (41/68). The significant clinical determinants of success were male sex (r = 0.35, p = 0.004), a higher body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.54, p = 0.001) and plasma creatinine (r = 0.25, p = 0.048) in univariate analysis. In multivariate linear regression analysis, only BMI was associated with success (coefficient = 0.049, p = 0.004). CT was discordant with AVS in 53% of patients, and would have resulted in inappropriate adrenalectomy in 43% of the patients and inappropriate exclusion from surgery in 10% of the cases. Conclusion: Clinical characteristics such as BMI and sex may influence the success rate of AVS. The inaccuracy of CT may result in inappropriate treatment proposals if the indication for surgical intervention is based on CT only.