In Defence of the Indefensible: Exploring Justification Narratives of Corporate Elites Accused of Corruption
Fiche du document
21 juin 2024
- doi: 10.58079/11vgw
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2607-1800
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Corruption Corrupt practicesCiter ce document
GdL, « In Defence of the Indefensible: Exploring Justification Narratives of Corporate Elites Accused of Corruption », Économie des conventions, ID : 10.58079/11vgw
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Mabel Torbor, David Sarpong, Georg Ofosu & Derrick Boakye (2024) Journal of Business Ethics, Online first, open access Abstract. Drawing on the pragmatic turn in contemporary social theory, we explore how corporate elites accused of corruption in the context of weak institutions engage in their justification works. Empirically, we focus on three high-profile corruption scandals that shook Ghana between 2010 and 2020 and inspired widespread public condemnation. Publicly accessible archival do...