A social vs. an institutional history of the “Financial Revolution” and the importance of experimentation. Part 1
Fiche du document
8 décembre 2019
- doi: 10.58079/n23z
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2725-4526
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Frontier troubles Public markets Annals IndebtednessCiter ce document
Stefano Condorelli, « A social vs. an institutional history of the “Financial Revolution” and the importance of experimentation. Part 1 », Notes on research, ID : 10.58079/n23z
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Since P.G.M. Dickson’s seminal study about post-1688 England, “Financial Revolution” (hereafter FR) has become a key notion for economic and financial historians.[1] The notion has given rise to an important historiographical debate which brought to light significant disagreements: What was the decisive feature of the FR: the long-term national debt, the tax system, the financial markets, the parliament’s “credible commitment” to the repay the national debt?[2] Did the FR start only after t...