A proposal for the glossing of bound formatives without committing to their nature

Fiche du document

Auteur
Date

29 juin 2015

Discipline
Types de document
Périmètre
Identifiant
Source

Diversity Linguistics Comment

Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2197-7518

Collection

Hypothèses : carnets de recherches en Sciences humaines et sociales

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Sujets proches En

Verb

Citer ce document

Eitan Grossman, « A proposal for the glossing of bound formatives without committing to their nature », Diversity Linguistics Comment, ID : 10.58079/nste

Métriques

Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Martin Haspelmath (2011) has argued that the notion ‘word’ is incoherent, and therefore is not useful as a cross-linguistically valid comparative concept or as a language-internal descriptive category. As a result, in his view, the distinction between bound formatives, e.g., affixes and clitics, is untenable. For example, in Lithuanian, the bound formative -si is traditionally analyzed as a suffix when it is in one position (after the verb when the verb has no prefixes) and as a prefix when ...

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en