Fiche du document
4 août 2023
- doi: 10.58079/rd3e
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Reviews Reviews Work, Method of Industry (Psychology) Method of work Reviews Theater reviews Terminology Reviews Television plays--Reviews Television reviews Social science Sciences, Social Human sciences Social studies Behavioral sciences Papers Reviews Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Book section Nomenclature Proper names Terminology World literature Western literature (Western countries) Belles-lettres Wellness Personal health Pattern Model Book reviews Reviews Fall Biography--HealthCiter ce document
Rooney Pinto, « What are the consequences of not using validated descriptors in the paper? », Socialis memoriae, ID : 10.58079/rd3e
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
While it is common practice in the health field to use validated descriptors available in thesauri or glossaries, in other fields it is apparent that researchers use the terms they feel are most appropriate. By ignoring accepted terminology, their work may fall off the radar of database searches. An example of this is the choice of keywords that are not associated with validated descriptors. As a direct consequence, literature reviews in some areas, particularly in the social sciences, may p...