Who is ultimately responsible for the rise of the multi-fucking-paradigm? Des usages théoriques en Histoire
Fiche du document
9 février 2015
- doi: 10.58079/so4j
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Social science Sciences, Social Human sciences Social studies Behavioral sciences Political power Empowerment (Social sciences) Medieval history History, Medieval Middle Ages--History Medieval period World history, Medieval Dark Ages Usages Customs, Social Traditions Social customs Folkways Social life and customs Ceremonies Historiographers Usages Politeness Condolence, Etiquette of Manners Ceremonies Ethnography Races of man Social anthropology Cultural anthropology Economic theory Political economy Political communicationCiter ce document
Quentin Verreycken, « Who is ultimately responsible for the rise of the multi-fucking-paradigm? Des usages théoriques en Histoire », ParenThèses, ID : 10.58079/so4j
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
« In a somewhat ironical manner, one might say that most historians only seem to jump on theoretical and conceptual bandwagons when they are already fashionable for at least a decade in the social sciences, in economics, cultural anthropology, literary or similar neighbouring fields ». Jan Dumolyn, Political communication and political power in the Middle Ages: a conceptual journey, dans Edad Media, 13, 2012, p. 35. Ça, c’est dit. Askville était un site de recherches mis en ligne par Amazon,...