L'immixtion et la trop grande expertise du propriétaire, cause d'exonération de responsabilité des architectes et des entrepreneurs sous l'article 1688 C.C.
Fiche du document
1978
- doi: 10.7202/042232ar
Ce document est lié à :
Les Cahiers de droit ; vol. 19 no. 1 (1978)
Tous droits réservés © Faculté de droit de l’Université Laval, 1978
Sujets proches
Obligation Accountability Moral responsibility Causality Effect and cause Cause and effect Final cause Architectural engineering Construction Buildings--Design and construction Engineering, Architectural Responsabilidad moral Causa y efecto Appareillage Flexion Cisaillement Charge Élasticité Durcissement Déformation Flambement Compression Estimation (art) Causation Cause finale Cause Principe de causalité Loi de causalité Effet et cause Cause et effet Génie architectural Responsabilité morale Responsabilité (morale) Responsabilité (philosophie) Obligation moraleCiter ce document
Michèle Rivet, « L'immixtion et la trop grande expertise du propriétaire, cause d'exonération de responsabilité des architectes et des entrepreneurs sous l'article 1688 C.C. », Les Cahiers de droit, ID : 10.7202/042232ar
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In May 1977, the Supreme Court of Canada gave an authoritative judgment on the interpretation of article 1688 of the Civil Code dealing with the liability of the builder and the architect. In Davie Shipbuilding Ltd v. Cargill Grain Company Ltd and The Foundation Company of Canada Ltd, the court established a new method of rebutting the presumption of liability resulting from the article. Indeed, the Supreme Court found that where the owner intervened during the construction and was more qualified than the contractors in charge of the work to judge its quality, he could not invoke the presumption resulting from article 1688 C.C. and was responsible for any loss. The case is not an easy one — questions of law and facts are not simple in this dispute involving more than eleven million dollars.