Human Capital or Cultural Taxation: What Accounts for Differences in Tenure and Promotion of Racialized and Female Faculty?

Fiche du document

Date

2017

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
Canadian Journal of Higher Education ; vol. 47 no. 3 (2017)

Collection

Erudit

Organisation

Consortium Érudit

Licence

Copyright (c), 2017RochelleWijesingha, HowardRamos



Citer ce document

Rochelle Wijesingha et al., « Human Capital or Cultural Taxation: What Accounts for Differences in Tenure and Promotion of Racialized and Female Faculty? », Canadian Journal of Higher Education / Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur, ID : 10.7202/1043238ar


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Achieving tenure and promotion are significant milestones in the career of a university faculty member. However, research often indicates that racialized and female faculty do not achieve tenure and promotion at the same rate as their non-racialized and male counterparts. Using new original survey data on faculty in eight Canadian universities, this paper examines differences in tenure and promotion among racialized and female faculty  and investigates the extent to which explanations of human capital theory and cultural or identity taxation account for these disparities. Logistic regression confirms that controlling for human capital and cultural or identity taxation washes away the differences between male and female faculty for achieving both tenure and promotion. However, differences for racialized faculty remain, thereby offering evidence of discrimination in the academic system.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en