Tableau vivant et postmodernité : quelles affinités ?

Fiche du document

Date

2019

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne ; vol. 44 no. 2 (2019)

Collection

Erudit

Organisation

Consortium Érudit

Licence

Tous droits réservés © UAAC-AAUC (University Art Association of Canada | Association d'art des universités du Canada), 2019


Sujets proches En

Modernism

Citer ce document

Carole Halimi, « Tableau vivant et postmodernité : quelles affinités ? », RACAR: Revue d'art canadienne / RACAR: Canadian Art Review, ID : 10.7202/1068315ar


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This article investigates the relationship of the tableau vivant to modernism and postmodernism and examines how the aesthetic characteristics mobilized by the tableau vivant disrupt the logic of modernism. In the nineteenth century, the tableau vivant, because of its intrinsic intermediality, was seen as overly theatrical and was thus relegated to the antechamber of photographic modernity, as a practice that discredited the seriousness of a medium in need of legitimization. By 1964, however, Robert Morris used the tableau vivant as an instrument to critique modernism in his work Site. Postmodernist artists explored the tableau vivant still further and used it repeatedly in photography, video, and performance. This article examines how Luigi Ontani, Cindy Sherman, and Yasumasa Morimura adopt the tableau vivant as an interface that allows them to physically manipulate representations of Western society in order to critique its values and codes.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en