Fiche du document
13 mai 2021
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.01954d...
- hal: hal-03247010
- doi: 10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//678024/EU/Strengthening European Food Chain Sustainability by Quality and Procurement Policy/Strength2Food
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Bargaining power Market power Transaction costs Institutions Social sustainability indicatorSujets proches
Negotiations Bargaining Haggling Negotiating Higgling Dickering Bargaining Labor negotiationsCiter ce document
Paul Muller et al., « Are Certified Supply Chains More Socially Sustainable ? A Bargaining Power Analysis », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1515/jafio-2019-0039
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Food quality schemes (FQS: organic and geographical indication products) are often supposed to be more sustainable by their political advocates. We explore the social sustainability advantage of FQS through the lens of supply chains’ bargaining power (BP) distribution. We propose an indicator synthesizing different sources underlying BP (competition-based, transactional, institutional) and counting two dimensions (fair BP distribution and adaptation capacity), that we apply to 18 FQS supply chains and corresponding reference. FQS perform better than their reference products on both dimensions. This better performance is due to a combination of sources.
