Involvement of the Left Supramarginal Gyrus in Manipulation Judgment Tasks: Contributions to Theories of Tool Use
Fiche du document
19 juin 2017
- ISIDORE Id: 10670/1.079668...
- hal: hal-04586795
- doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000455
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S1355617717000455
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Lesourd -Left supramarginal gyrus and manipulation judgment task Transmagnetical stimulation tool use gesture engram theory technical reasoning theory inferior parietal lobe apraxia Lesourd -Left supramarginal gyrus and manipulation judgment task Transmagnetical stimulation tool use gesture engram theory technical reasoning theory inferior parietal lobe apraxiaSujets proches
JudgementCiter ce document
Mathieu Lesourd et al., « Involvement of the Left Supramarginal Gyrus in Manipulation Judgment Tasks: Contributions to Theories of Tool Use », HAL SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société), ID : 10.1017/S1355617717000455
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Objectives: Two theories of tool use, namely the gesture engram and the technical reasoning theories, make distinct predictions about the involvement of the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL) in manipulation judgement tasks. The objective here is to test these alternative predictions based on previous studies on manipulation judgment tasks using transcranial magnetic stimulations (TMS) targeting the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG). Methods: We review recent TMS studies on manipulation judgement tasks and confront these data with predictions made by both tool use theories. Results: The left SMG is a highly intertwined region, organized following several functionally distinct areas and TMS may have disrupted a cortical network involved in the ability to use tools rather than only one functional area supporting manipulation knowledge. Moreover, manipulation judgement tasks may be impaired following virtual lesions outside the IPL. Conclusions: These data are more in line with the technical reasoning hypothesis, which assumes that the left IPL does not store manipulation knowledge per se . ( JINS , 2017, 23 , 685–691)
